Maybe not in a situation like the one you describe. We want it to still be an option, but that does not mean we recommend that it always be done. Currently, each situation can be assessed individually. To us, that is a very important value. I think that the Catholic Church of Quebec is particularly sensitive to this phenomenon. There is a highly developed social conscience among our Christian communities in Quebec.
The importance people place on the primacy of the human being is something we value highly. We hope the decisions the government makes are made humanely by human beings equipped with all of the information about the situation. Community values and the ability to judge what is truly the right option and the right result, taking into account in particular the situation of the individual accused and of the victims, are very important. What is going to make sense? To us, the community has to deal with a number of these problems. People have to solve the problems among themselves. What the government does can greatly assist us in having tools for the job. We are opposed to having a general law that prevents us from acting according to our human conscience in certain situations, because the law requires it. We do not find that to be humane. Just because we want the option always to be there does not mean that in every situation you describe, a conditional sentence would be recommended.