I certainly encourage this committee to look at it closely. Certainly ideas for changes are among the things that could come up in the course of this review.
To respond directly to your question, the types of investigations you're talking about are exactly those for which this law enforcement justification was designed. In general, this law enforcement justification is not something that the ordinary police officer on the street will be using.
It's most useful for complex investigations into organized crimes from the examples you give: terrorism and other related complex undercover operations. It is a subset of police officers and other law enforcement officers who will receive the designation. It was especially designed to be used in those circumstances. I hope it's proven to be a useful tool. I'll certainly leave it to the law enforcement officers, who will likely be providing testimony, to further inform you about how useful they feel it is, whether they feel there are gaps, and whether on an operational basis it requires further assessment.
I think that's as far as I can go in responding to that question.