Then you're really talking about the requirements under the rules of disclosure. Stinchcombe was a constitutional case; there is a constitutional right for disclosure. So if you were to take an approach statutorily excluding certain information that met the standard of relevance, you might be restraining what is in fact a constitutional right of a defence to receive disclosure at that point.
That particular suggestion hasn't come up. There has been a Justice Canada document with respect to disclosure reform. It was published in November 2004, discussing issues with respect to disclosure reform--how disclosure could be made more effective and efficient. That particular idea was not part of it, but there are some guidelines. If you would like us to ensure that the committee gets a copy of that consultation document, I could ensure that you get it.