No, that would not be possible under these provisions. They would not receive any justification. There would be two fundamental requirements of the justification provisions that prevent that.
With respect to the law enforcement justification, the two requirements are addressed in the handout we've provided, on page 2, in the second and third requirements there. First, they must be engaged in an investigation or enforcement. An enforcement officer who would use the justification to justify personal conduct, engaged in a lark of his own, engaged in his own personal criminal endeavour, would receive no justification whatsoever under this scheme. And if that weren't enough, I don't think there'd be any chance that conduct where a police officer was using it for his personal benefit would be viewed as reasonable or proportional under the scheme. I don't think there is much, or any, scope for such conduct to be justified under the law enforcement justification regime.
On the next question you had about the potential for lists of undercover officers who had received designations, the possibility that they would be leaked or come into knowledge of organized crime and therefore compromise investigations, my colleague Erin McKey will respond.