The main difference is the treatment. The normal difference that you see in terms of how that plays out is treatment versus calling it counselling. Often the service the offender receives is the same, and the issue is calling it “house arrest” as opposed to “curfew”. On probation, we have probationers. With curfews, we have many probationers who get treatment as well. The difference with the conditional sentence is that you can call it “treatment” when you order it, as opposed to putting it on a probation order and putting “counselling” or “rehabilitative programming” and so on. That's a difference in the language, but in fact that offender may go to the same program as the one on the conditional sentence. It's the language.
With conditional sentencing, you don't have to have the offender's consent to order treatment; with probation, you do, but in fact the service the offender may get may be the same service. It may even be at the same facility. That's the legal issue about needing consent versus not, but we would still have that offender on probation and we would still assess the offender and send the person to whatever rehabilitation was necessary, using the term that's on a probation order, which is very similar.