From the existing legislation, no, and I'll tell you why. I even thought of what the most serious charge could be. It's probably manslaughter. Manslaughter in one case can be some fellow who has gone to a bar with his wife or girlfriend and some other fellow makes a comment and the first fellow punches that second fellow. The punch kills the guy. That's a one-punch thing, and all he's doing there.... Now, maybe that's a conditional sentence and maybe it isn't under the circumstances. Of course, manslaughter could be something much, much more violent than that.
Take a case that's already been mentioned, impaired driving causing death. You have two friends. The driver of the car also suffers an incredible brain injury and can barely function now, but he is fit and he understands the judicial process. To put him in jail would effectively be to kill him, yet a suspended sentence is probably not denunciatory enough from society's point of view, because he did cause someone's death. So perhaps a conditional sentence is a good middle road.
All I'm saying is if it's a serious crime, there's no reason why we can't be tough on it with what we have now. We're not changing the ability of judges to send people to jail. They do send them to jail. We're just giving them another tool.