Yes.
Certainly there's no suggestion that corruption starts around the $220,000-a-year level. At either level, they're not likely to be corrupted. But I'm talking philosophically.
Why does our Constitution establish that Parliament sets the salary of judges? Judges are the third arm of the government and they have to be independent. In order to be independent, they have to have a standard of living that's commensurate with the job they do. And amongst other things, philosophically it prevents them from being subject to corruption. It has nothing to do with whether it's $220,000 or $240,000 or $180,000.