You're to entitled to it. They're your questions.
First, for Mr. Carpay, you've suggested that the work of the Law Commission could be done by other sources, universities and so on. Could you describe that a bit? Why do you think the work of the Law Commission is done?
I tend to agree with you that we all have our biases. I think everyone in this room has their own world view, and you've said your organization does too. So how do you see this idea, already mentioned, of a neutral way of addressing law reform? In my view, if we have any recommendations to change the law, we're making some value judgment on whether we like it, whether it goes too far, or whether it doesn't go far enough. The Law Commission, in its recommendations, would draw some conclusions. I'm wondering how you see that role being filled by other organizations.