Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I seem to recall that there was another report. I realize you did this slide for this hearing, but there was another deck that explained with more words. I can understand, coming to a parliamentary committee, just using pictures and graphs is probably good--a little self-deprecation here, guys--but I do recall there being a footnote or an explanation, how a definition of gun crime had been changed regarding whether it was suspected, under investigation, or convicted.
If you have no idea what I'm talking about, I'll have to find it and come back.
You do. Then could you explain that? Which slide is most relevant to it?