Yes, thank you.
First off, when you look at Pennsylvania and things like that, it's ups and downs. Because it happened coincidentally that they passed a minimum law and then it was down the next year doesn't prove that was the reason. Just as it was pointed out, in Canada we have ups and downs in the same time period with the same minimums--up in Toronto and down in Montreal. So just the fact that one follows the other doesn't prove anything, and that's why these things are very hard to prove.
Secondly, Mr. Bryant mentioned one case, yes. Are you going to pass a bill based on one case or 10 cases? Why don't you do some serious studying? There are facts out there that can be studied. You could have researchers do those studies and then consider whether there really are any significant number of cases that justify this. That would be my response, sir.
With my apologizes, then, as I informed your clerk earlier, I have to go downtown. Thank you very much for allowing me to state my views to you.