Thank you.
I noted in the spring and I asked the minister twice about the Levitt study, because that was the case he cited as evidence. Anybody who has read all summer long all of the criminology reports.... There's been more than one, and I'd suggest that members opposite in the government that cited that study should start taking a look at all the criticisms of the Levitt study. I will definitely ask our minister about that, because Doob and Cesaroni's study was very comprehensive. It canvassed the numerous pieces that came out, attacking the methodology, among other things. I'm not going to take all of my time, but I would have thought that the justice department would have given that to the government, and I'm sure they did. Whether they read it or not, I don't know.
The next point I want to make is to Mr. Stewart. You had talked in response to a question from my Bloc colleague about proportionality and sentencing. You were talking about disproportionate incarceration in the Australian study, and I did want to point out and make it for the record that it was disproportionate not to the individual sentences, but disproportionate in that it found that it affected aboriginal peoples in that country. That wasn't made clearly enough on the record.