I guess you've raised a couple of points. You've asked me about the rationale for Bill C-13 and the way it was introduced, and I'm obviously not in a position to comment on that, and I suppose anything I had to say on it would be somewhat suspect since I wasn't a part of that particular government. But I will say, and I think it's fair to say, there was a belief that the technology and science were developing so quickly that the previous government wanted to have something that would update the provisions with respect to DNA. I believe that was the rationale. Again, I'm not here as, and I guess you're not expecting me to be, a spokesperson for how it was done.
But we do have it now, and there were some technical problems with it that the previous Parliament attempted to address. Of course, it died on the order paper, which also killed the opportunity, quite frankly, for the review you just mentioned.