I think the fact that it's not been used is a reflection of how seriously we take this piece of legislation and the honesty and integrity of our members in dealing with this legislation in a very forthright and forthcoming way. It's very clear as to when it should be used, and our members are very clearly educated on the fact that if you do use it, you'd better need to use it. It's not dissuading them from using it, but telling them if you use it, you'd better be able to stand behind what you've done.
On May 30th, 2006. See this statement in context.