So then, if I understand correctly, in the case of so-called secondary designated offences, the accused must show cause that a DNA order could be prejudicial to him.
On March 1st, 2007. See this statement in context.
On March 1st, 2007. See this statement in context.
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
So then, if I understand correctly, in the case of so-called secondary designated offences, the accused must show cause that a DNA order could be prejudicial to him.
See context to find out what was said next.