So then, if I understand correctly, in the case of so-called secondary designated offences, the accused must show cause that a DNA order could be prejudicial to him.
On March 1st, 2007. See this statement in context.
On March 1st, 2007. See this statement in context.
March 1st, 2007 / 9:05 a.m.
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC
So then, if I understand correctly, in the case of so-called secondary designated offences, the accused must show cause that a DNA order could be prejudicial to him.
See context to find out what was said next.