Mr. Ménard, actually going back to your initial question about difficulties in determining sexual exploitation, I think this bill actually brings clarity to that. It makes it very clear that we don't get into the question anymore for 14-year-old and 15-year-old children as to whether there is “consent”. We believe that other than the exceptions that are provided for teenagers engaging in consensual sexual activity, we make it very clear that we're having a prohibition, and ultimately it's a judgment call. You may disagree with that and say it's 14 or it's 13 or once upon a time it was 12, but a decision was made in this country to move it from 12 to 14, and I think that was consistent with views in this country, and we are making that judgment call as well, that 16 is a more defensible age in trying to protect.
I indicated to you that according to the information we have from Cybertip.ca about the sexual exploitation of 14-year-olds and 15-year-olds, very often they are the ones who are victimized at that particular age. They are a particular target for people who are sexual predators.