I was just going to add to what Mr. Pruden said. We must remember that the double charge may very well have been laid--the impaired driving and the “over 80”. And if the crown has very good evidence of erratic driving and all—the smell of alcohol, the bloodshot eyes, the person is falling down drunk—and they've got a BAC of 0.22, it's highly unlikely that anybody is going to take a shot at this defence. So those would be circumstances in which there is likely to be a guilty plea to one or the other of the offences.
But where the evidence on the impaired driving is not as high—through a RIDE program or something like that—the defence is, in all likelihood, going to be the two-beer defence.