Evidence of meeting #79 for Justice and Human Rights in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was defence.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Greg Yost  Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice
Hal Pruden  Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

—“in the Criminal Code...”.

The location of that particular subamendment may not be the best.

6:40 p.m.

Liberal

Derek Lee Liberal Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

I'll withdraw it, then.

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

You withdraw?

6:40 p.m.

Liberal

Derek Lee Liberal Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

I'll withdraw the amendment.

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Okay.

Mr. Petit.

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

Daniel Petit Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

No, it's okay.

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

The question is on the subamendment.

Mr. Ménard.

6:40 p.m.

Bloc

Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC

Just for information, and without committing ourselves to anything in the future, could you see if it is the will of the committee to include the regulations? I know that a special committee reviews all regulations. But since it looks at them all, it does so very quickly, not to say superficially. If the committee feels that we should not review the regulations, I will respect its opinion. If not, I am going to propose a subamendment, but the mover would have to be in agreement.

6:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Mr. Yost, can you comment in reference to Mr. Ménard's concern?

6:40 p.m.

Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

Greg Yost

Well, practically, I think the committee would in due course insist that it would look at the regulations.

It has been a few years since I was a legislative drafter in Manitoba, but if the wording were “a comprehensive review of the provisions of the Criminal Code with respect to impaired driving, including any regulations under the Criminal Code with respect thereto”, I can't see why we would object to that. If you want to put the regulations in, that's fine. My view is that they would be there anyhow, but make a specific mention of it.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Can we do that through a friendly amendment?

6:45 p.m.

Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

Greg Yost

I can't move amendments.

6:45 p.m.

Bloc

Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC

I will move the amendment.

6:45 p.m.

Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

Greg Yost

I can just put wording on it.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Monsieur Ménard, would you like to move that friendly amendment?

6:45 p.m.

Bloc

Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga, QC

Yes. I will move the exact amendment that Mr—

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Mr. Yost, could you repeat that, please?

6:45 p.m.

Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

Greg Yost

It would start with “a comprehensive review of the provisions of the Criminal Code with respect to impaired driving, including any regulations related thereto”—

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

And then it would continue, “and the effect of its implementation”—

6:45 p.m.

Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice

Greg Yost

—“and shall, within six months after the review is undertaken, submit a report—”.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

Okay.

Now, the question is on--

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

Daniel Petit Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

The subamendment.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

The subamendment.

Thank you, Mr. Petit.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

The double subamendment.

6:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Art Hanger

The question is on the subamendment.

(Subamendment agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

(New clause 11.1 as amended agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

(On clause 12)