It's interesting, because to my knowledge journalism is not regulated in every province in the same way that a solicitor is. A solicitor is defined. You have to be a member of the bar. It's defined, so we know what a solicitor is.
I actually think the concern is—and our child exploitation people will tell us this—that there are websites written in such a way as to have editorials. They have papers. They are promoting the benefits of child exploitation. It's hard to understand, it's bizarre, but they're promoting it in a way that one could argue that they say they're disseminating information.
Our concern is that the way this bill is drafted, it could be used as a shield for people it was never intended for, and in many ways it colours legitimate, true journalism and brings a level of disrepute that we don't want to introduce into it.