What I don't hear from Mr. Moore is that he's opposed to the motion in principle, so I guess what we're caught with is a scheduling issue or a priority issue. I wonder if Mr. Ménard would consider amending his motion with respect to that second line, which really talks about the “when”, because what I hear from Mr. Moore is that there are priorities, legislation, that some of the parties are agreeing to have expedited. I'm only suggesting that perhaps we could do this over a series of weeks rather than doing it in one full week, to avoid the undoubtable blame that will come that we're somehow delaying or frustrating the government's program, which is not the intention. It's a motion. The member has a good motion, but there ought to be a way to accommodate it without slowing the business of government legislation.
But the ball is in Mr. Ménard's court because it's his motion.