First, I don't want to talk about the example you mentioned. Let's take the example of some criminal organization trying to get control of criminal markets, instead.
I come back to the fact that we need to prevent these criminal organizations from getting the support of experienced people, people well known in their fields, who have expertise and a reputation that can help criminal organizations take over businesses, whether it be automotive, construction or restaurant businesses.
At present, they find some individuals useful and necessary. They are essential to these organizations. So we have to prevent this. We have to deter them from providing assistance to these criminal groups.
At present, an individual, for example a notary, who is charged with aiding a criminal organization is liable to a maximum sentence of five years, under the Criminal Code. It's the same thing for a driver who drives the criminals to a location where a transaction takes place, while the notary's assistance meant that the criminal organization could inject millions of dollars into the economy and take over legal businesses and jobs, and then, in a majority of cases, defraud the government.
So we have to make a distinction among these categories of enablers, between a driver, for example, and someone like a notary or an accountant who manages the assets and conducts the financial transactions.