I am not thinking of any specific argument, other than that in fact the defence tries to establish that the person committed the crime for personal benefit. That prevents us from establishing that it is a crime committed for the benefit of an organization. We are not talking about a specific argument here, such as an attempt to discredit the evidence presented by the police or the witnesses' qualifications and knowledge. Ultimately, the work comes down to finding the weak link.
On May 12th, 2009. See this statement in context.