Yes, that's right. It's essentially my position. I want to make it clear. Somebody inferred that I might have said that because a person's bilingual he's therefore not competent. I don't know how that could have been misinterpreted. I'm not saying that. Usually you find people who are bilingual very competent as judges. I have no problem with that. It's an added feature. It's something that elevates them a step higher than another. But we're not talking about those people. We're talking about the tough case, where you have to make a choice—if it ever comes to that—between the most competent but inadequate in this requirement and somebody not as competent.
To me, it would be a mistake to sacrifice competency. If you don't have to sacrifice competency, then it's not a question.