Certainly, it's a good point.
We're not asking for a finding of innocence. This is not a response to an individual being charged with an offence. Maybe there are other venues that could address this, not through the criminal system. It's just an official statement from the court saying that an investigation has been carried out and the police have found, and there is a result, that this individual has been a victim of identity theft. The individual is not being accused of an offence. It's just a statement—in other jurisdictions they've chosen to do it through their penal code and through the courts—so the victim has something to show that there's been an investigation and that there is an official finding that they have been the victim of identity theft, which they can take to creditors to stop them from harassing them.
It is something that we think can reasonably be addressed through the Criminal Code. It's been done this way in other jurisdictions. It's a result of a criminal investigation that's getting judicial sanction.