I don't think I do. What might have been considered to be a gap was that both the federal proceeds and the provincial proceeds legislation are premised on proving the substantive offence, which can be a somewhat difficult chore. If you don't prove the substantive offence, then you cannot proceed with the forfeiture aspects of it.
Civil forfeiture is based not on having the substantive offence proved beyond a reasonable doubt but rather beyond a balance of probabilities. So we hope that gap has been filled.