Just as a follow-up to this bit about Stinchcombe, trying to allow disclosure to be made after the election and plea, the theme of all of this—and I hear Mr. Ménard on requests to admit and I hear issues around representation, so that you don't end up on the courtroom steps getting an adjournment because of an inexperienced counsel.... It's all around that theme of avoiding the cost and delay, because a delayed criminal trial is a cost to everyone. I'll add on to the question you didn't answer about reforming Stinchcombe to allow disclosure along the way, as a bit of a provocative question in light of what you said about the capability of lawyers: are there some judges who aren't quite cut out to handle mega-trials?
I know that the Federal Court deals with federal jurisdiction, but many of those judges are specialists in certain areas, and I know that the Ontario court has such a plethora of judges that they more or less specialize. Is there a need to have a specialization amongst the judiciary in Canada to handle mega-trials, or is a mega-trial just a bigger normal trial?
There are three questions wrapped up in there, Judge.