To answer that question, I look forward to the longitudinal follow-up of who didn't succeed post release to the community, and to start looking into that group of individuals who got re-involved with criminal activity--that was officially recorded. At least then we know. In that group, I would probably delve in deeper, and some of that was mentioned at table in terms of looking in other constructs, maybe psychological evaluations as opposed to the traditional kinds of things that we look at, measure psychopathy, get an understanding of cognitive functioning in terms of how they think and how they operate in the sense of what changes you can make there.
You also have to get a very deep understanding in terms of what is the personal, interpersonal, and community reinforcement for their behaviour. Some of those personal characteristics can be emotional. Some of those interpersonal things can be emotional as well. And understanding the rewards and costs for the behaviour...I think for this group, in particular, the density rewards for engaging in the behaviour are uniquely different than for other offender populations. That requires a fair level of investigative effort and research effort.
Fortunately, in Canada, there are people in the academic community as well as in the correctional organizations who have the skill sets to undertake that kind of research activity.