Just to better say that this is your concentration, the other day the minister made it clear that he feels this act visits specific deterrents on young offenders, on youth. While I understand what he's saying, what I think you're saying is that these persistent offenders present a public security risk, a public safety risk, and should be incarcerated with a view to programming having an effect. I may have missed it, but I don't think I heard you say that the effect of this bill, further incarceration, will be a specific deterrent.
In fact, I thought the theme of your talk—correct me if I'm wrong—was that this small group of persistent young offenders is deterrent-proof. They're very difficult to deter, specifically. Is that not right?