In relation to proceeds that are properly seized by the court, with all the balances that need to be put in place, I think that's probably a wise use for them--put them back into the community and make it known. No question about it. It should be something we promote. And that might be something you want to address.
There are bad people. I've met them. I probably have defended a couple. But at the end of the day, some have to be separated. They have to be incarcerated, and they have to be incarcerated for a lengthy period of time. If they're repeat offenders who don't care, as opposed to repeat chronic offenders who have something that's not addressed, then they should be dealt with harshly. And I believe they are.
I'm not going to stand up and submit to a court that someone who doesn't care, who commits violent offences, should be treated like a first offender. That's not my job. It's not fair. I'm a member of the community. So no question about it. And I really want to say to you that I think the really bad ones are few and far between. But there are some out there, and the courts are equipped to deal with them.
I'm not sure if you asked this question, but I'm going to throw it back anyway. There is a movement--as you did in Northumberland--to involve people in the community. The police are really at the forefront of this now. Everyone is being engaged, not only the police and the community, but also the defence and the judges are moving into the community to explain how the--