Evidence of meeting #50 for Justice and Human Rights in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was court.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Carole Morency  Acting General Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section, Department of Justice
Jean-Guy Dagenais  President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec
Hirsch Greenberg  Member of the Board of Directors, Canadian Criminal Justice Association

5 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC

Thank you very much for your presentations.

Mr. Dagenais, you are the president of the Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec. I would like to ask you if you and your association are aware of a Nova Scotia commission of inquiry, headed by Mr. Justice Nunn, into the case of a young offender. As the result of this young person's deplorable activities, people demanded a public inquiry. In the course of the inquiry, Justice Nunn looked at the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Criminal Justice Act in detail. He made a number of recommendations, some of which affected only the provincial government, such as youth protection or services of that kind. But six recommendations dealt with the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Are you aware of those recommendations?

5 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

Right off the bat, I would say no, I am not aware of them.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC

In 2007, in a previous life, I was the official opposition's justice critic. I asked for the executive summary of the report to be translated. So I am in possession of a translation of the report, including the recommendations. I would like to provide you and Mr. Greenberg with a copy.

At the time, I sent the report to several major players in Quebec. The response to Justice Nunn's recommendations was quite favourable. I would like you and Mr. Greenberg to provide written comments and send them to our chair, so that all members of the committee can have the benefit of your expertise in the area, your analysis of and take on Justice Nunn's recommendations.

5:05 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

Ms. Jennings, you said that you had sent copies of the report to various organizations. I gather that we were not on your list at the time. Which year was it?

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC

It was in 2007. I have to say that the Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec was not on my list. At the time, the government had no interest in reviewing the current act.

5:05 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

I would be delighted to provide comments on the report when I get a copy.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC

My distribution list at the time was quite limited.

5:05 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

As soon as I get the document, I will be happy to comment on it.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Marlene Jennings Liberal Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, QC

Thank you very much, Mr. Dagenais.

Mr. Greenberg, for you, it's the same thing. I have the executive summary. I can also provide you with the links where you can get the full report online. It's written in English. It's an excellent report and I have to say that the recommendations with regard to actual amendments to the current law were very considered.

Unfortunately, the government's Bill C-4 does not follow those recommendations. It's unfortunate, because the report came out in December 2006, I believe, if I'm not mistaken, so the government has had a number of years to study the report, to consider it, and to do their consultations.

It has decided not to implement those recommendations, in fact, notwithstanding that at the time there seemed to be a real consensus across Canada. I consulted with different stakeholder groups across the provinces, including the Attorneys General, and there seemed to be a real sense that yes, Justice Nunn's recommendations were what was needed--nothing else.

Thank you.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Ed Fast

Thank you.

We'll move to Mr. Ménard for seven minutes.

5:05 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

Thank you.

Mr. Dagenais, you say that you are in favour of making it easier to publish the names of young offenders. Some people have testified at this committee that some leaders of youth gangs would be only too happy to have their names published, and even happier to be identified as gang members on the front page of the Journal de Montréal. Don't you think that it will make them more intent on pursuing a life of crime?

5:05 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

What we are seeing, Mr. Ménard, is that there seems to be more serious crime. You mention street gangs. They are often going to make use of younger people. I would not go so far as to say that it is because young people must be less accountable for their actions. After all, we are talking about serious offences like premeditated murder. In cases like that, we also have to protect society, as I mentioned in my brief. Victims often do not know that people like that are living in their neighbourhood. If the information were made public, the people could be recognized. I understand that they might be happy seeing themselves on the front page, but you have to think of the victims too.

In some adult cases, identities have been made widely known and it has even been difficult to send them to half-way houses because of it.

Right from the moment where the judge decides that the young person has committed a crime, it is important that the identity be made known in order to protect the public, as I mentioned in my brief. We are often talking about sexual predators, and, unfortunately, there are young ones too. Making identities known, be it sooner or later, is about protecting society.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

As a parent, if you find that a young person who has had his name revealed is in fact the child of one of your neighbours, what are you going to tell your children about him?

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

If I had children and found that a young person living two blocks from me had committed a serious sexual offence—this is always about serious crimes—there would be a need to make the neighbourhood safe. Too often, people like that are released quickly, get back into society and live unnoticed. That is when they can reoffend.

Definitely in the case of serious offences—I insist once more that the offence must be serious—the offender's identity must be made known and people must be alerted. People must be protected and must protect themselves by making sure to report incidents to the police.

When I was working as a police officer in smaller communities, people very often told us that a person like that was back in their neighbourhood. People were protecting themselves. You also have to think of the victims. That is how victims go about protecting themselves.

That is why I said that it is good to make the information public. It does not have to be done in all cases, but certainly with serious offences.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

Do you understand why the bill is called Sébastien's Law?

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

Yes, I do, I know that a young person of that name lost his life in a neighbourhood in Laval because of a group of young people. I have met his parents too. That is why the bill is called Sébastien's Law.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

And the young person who murdered Sébastien was sent to adult court.

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

He was sent to prison for life.

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

I can't see how the law can be applied more severely than that.

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

He was sent to prison for life. He won't be getting out anytime soon.

But you know as well as I do how many times sexual predators have been released, unfortunately. There was another case in Sainte-Foy, near Quebec City. A sexual predator was released and his identity was not revealed. Thanks to the actions of a good Samaritan who reported having seen a sexual predator putting a child into the trunk of his vehicle, the Quebec City police were able to make the arrest. We have that witness to thank for that.

If identities are revealed, members of the public can definitely become witnesses. Can you really be against that?

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

It wasn't a sexual predator in Sébastien's case.

5:10 p.m.

President, Association des policières et policiers provinciaux du Québec

Jean-Guy Dagenais

You are right.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

Some kids were arguing over a girl.

Do you understand that the goal of the bill is to amend the act so that what happened to Sébastien Lacasse never happens again?