In all cases there are degrees of participation. They used to say that if you robbed a bank, the getaway car driver shouldn't get the same as the guy who held the gun. But he's an integral part of it, and therefore if you get life for robbing the bank, then probably the guy who drove away in the getaway car is going to get life as well. I agree that there are degrees of complicity, and some people are taken in. But I would think that you could measure that minor involvement in comparison to what I call the major involvement in these crimes, whereby you might have a discretion for the 18-year-old boy who does something by way of assisting his older brother who's deeply involved in organized crime and assist in that way.
I really don't want you to think that I am vacillating, but what I'm saying is that I recognize the fact that there's minor participation, there's major participation. For major participation, I don't think that any judge would argue with minimum sentences in those. It's the minor participation that is perhaps where discretion might come into play because of youth and other mitigating factors.