If a judge veers from the minimum, the judge has an obligation at that stage—and they presently have an obligation—to say why they are veering from the minimum, in the same way as when you have the crown and defence counsel agreeing on a sentence, with a joint submission, and the judge says, “No, I'm not going to go for that; I think this should be higher.” Or the judge may think it should be lower.
In those cases, judges are obliged to set out the reasons. The same thing would apply when it comes to the minor involvement of individuals in organized crime.