I'm just kidding.
But we hear from defence attorneys all the time. Mr. Rathgeber and I share the view that as members of the Canadian Bar Association—and I've spoken with the Canadian Bar Association about it--the only filter we seem to get....
They're very good lawyers. They're criminal defence attorneys. But they are the squeakiest wheel, and they tend to make other people think that's all lawyers think about.
The question is this. How different, really, do you think, in your experience, prosecutors are from defence attorneys in viewing these pretrial procedures and these interlocutory motions to narrow down the discovery process? How far apart do you think they would be, if you could get them into a room?