Perhaps you can help us with this. We had a prosecutor here earlier today; I'm left with the understanding, from what he was telling us, that by going with the smaller number—four or five, as opposed to twenty or thirty—they are then more limited in their ability to convince judge and jury of the scope of the crimes that have been committed.
Would you share that type of opinion; that is, that by going with the mini-megatrial, if I can put it that way, we are not going to be able to as effectively fight organized crime, because we can't demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt the magnitude of the offence?