I guess the amendments have been ruled out of order because if we have an independent process there may have to be an expenditure of money to provide for that. I don't think it stops me, though, from arguing on the amendment itself as to why an independent adjudicative process is required, and I'll do that.
It was proposed because the circumstances we have here are squarely in relation to the Ashley Smith concerns and considerations. You know, I guess there will now be two types of--
