No, I don't think it does.
As I said before with respect to the “reasonable time”, the police quite rightly err on the side of laying charges when they're unsure, for the protection of the public at large. In this case—and I'm certainly not criticizing the use of the word “reasonable”—there shouldn't necessarily be a strict time limit in the legislation. I'm not sure that this legislation provides clarity to the police, because a police officer coming upon this kind of scenario, in which an arrest is effected, only five or twelve hours or a day later is going to say: “The legislation says 'within a reasonable time afterwards'. I'm not sure what that means. Let's charge the person and let the court figure it out.”