My preference is that it be left as is and you let the judiciary continue to perform the elasticity and legal gymnastics necessary to exonerate people like David Chen when the cases arise. Allow them to remain “find committing” rather than prescribed.
If this is an inevitability of some sort, I suggest that the two criteria of space and time need to be considered. I can't give you some example in text, or anything like that, but I can tell you that this is a really important issue. It will also be a very important issue for the private security industry. Private security companies already share information on persons wanted through their information network. Many security companies have multiple sites. In downtown Toronto one security company secures more square footage than the public police, especially in social housing. In fact, you had the president of that company speak to you.
They routinely share information from client to client and from security guard to security guard. There is no reason why you might imagine that someone would commit an offence on one property and they could easily arrest them. You may or may not want that. My purpose here today is to convey to you that it will definitely happen. The security industry will do this. You have to decide whether or not you want to build constraints around that. As a private citizen, I hope you do. If the law doesn't stay as is, I would very much appreciate a time and space constraint on these powers.