I'm speaking from what Mr. Woodworth described as principles of criminal law and criminal law development, which is that broad, overarching laws are generally—and we may disagree on the principle—preferable to particularistic ones. That's not to say that some particular laws don't resonate well with certain constituents within society or command the respect of society writ large. But once you start down the road of having overly particularized offences, you're going to have a push-back from others who feel that their monuments should also have that type of protection.
It is, for example, like when you make an apology to a certain group for an event that happened in the past. You're going to get a lot more people coming forward saying: “We too experienced.... Why aren't we getting an apology?”