But there's nothing about the phrasing of the bill that actually goes to those kinds of people and that kind of intentionality. It's a much broader sweep. It approaches almost a strict liability offence if people actually do not know that what they're in the middle of has become illegal.
So my concern is to make sure the transition is clearly signalled in a way that's fair to people, to allow them to have a chance to remove themselves from the situation, and nothing you've said tells me that this is something you would entertain as an amendment. Would you entertain that?