Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, Justice Major, for joining us at a distance.
I just wanted to clarify one thing just to make sure that I understood.
You spoke, Mr. Justice Major, about criminal law principles as one reason to be wary of mandatory minimums and you also spoke separately of charter thresholds. Would I be correct in understanding you as saying they are two different things? Something could pass muster under the charter and still not be the best thing from a criminal law principles perspective?