I just wanted to clear that up because it must have been a mistake, a “not”. When you remove one little word of three letters, the impact can be so much more devastating.
Does the fact that section 736 can be used—in other words, that provincial and territorial programs can be accessed—somewhat diminish the potentially negative impact on individuals who are unable to pay because of extreme poverty, mental health issues or other reasons? Does that aspect not give you some reassurance, Ms. Pate?