I'm confused as to why the motion is brought at 4:25 as opposed to 5:25.
Yes, there is a lot of interest in this bill. These are important matters, and we want to get this right, so we have taken some time and considered alternative definitions of what is and isn't “gender identity”. I don't know why this committee would presuppose its progress in the next hour. Maybe we will get through it.
In any event, I would suggest that the motion is premature at this point and I would encourage honourable members to vote against it.