Ms. Boivin, during your presentation of the motion I missed something. It might have been in the translation, I'm not certain, but I'm confused about the motivation for this. You mentioned an article and a court case. I'm sorry, but I'm just not familiar with it.
I'm intrigued by your motion, frankly. I think Parliament, and certainly this committee, has an obligation to ensure that the legislation that goes through Parliament is charter-proof, but I'm perplexed about what you hope this study would accomplish. This is a legislative committee, and the legislation exists. Is it your suggestion that the legislation's not being followed?