We don't look at the threat assessment for necessarily higher or lower, inside or outside Canada. Counter-proliferation as an issue has a lot of different layers to it. There are issues of financing, export, tracking and control, capacity building abroad, protection of nuclear facilities, and so on. Each one of those issues has its own set of risks framework around it and ways to mitigate that risk. I'm not really answering your question here but I think it's hard to categorize whether the risk inside or outside Canada is really the way to look at it or the best way to look at it.
From our point of view, it's important to understand from an aggregate level the counter-proliferation risk and to be able to explain it a lot more to Canadians. This is a difficult issue. It's complex. Most of the things that come with it take place far away. There are issues of dual-use technologies and very complicated financing regimes and so on.
We're still working on our ability to express ourselves in aggregate on the risk of counter-proliferation.