I am satisfied that there now is going to be notice to people within a 90-day period from the day on which they were intercepted, but for me, the question isn't, are people then going to be able to get involved in a possibly lengthy legal process to vindicate their rights that were violated at the outset 90 days ago.
I would like to also call your attention to a case from Ontario, R. v. Riley in which the section 184.4 wiretap lasted for four days. Is four days going to be considered a reasonable amount of time to intercept somebody's communications without a warrant? I would think not.
It seems that a 24-hour period kind of already comports with what at least one RCMP detachment has used as their policy, so we don't think that this is an unreasonable amount of time, or that this wouldn't be enough time, and—