Taking into consideration that Montreal is a big city, two kilometres is not a lot. Let's say “should have known” is different from “known”. Let's say someone lives in Montreal and used to coach the victim but didn't know he was living two kilometres away from the victim. The criteria here is two kilometres. As I said, Toronto, Vancouver, Gatineau, and Ottawa are big cities. The criteria is two kilometres. Is it “should have known” that he would live in the same city within two kilometres? Is it reasonable doubt, or beyond reasonable doubt?
Do you know what I'm saying?