Mr. Chair, the courts deal with this language already. It's already in the Criminal Code. It's commonly used.
The courts and the administrative bodies would determine whether this offender knew or should have known. If the offender is driving down the street and the offender and the victim see each other in a car, in that case the offender would not have known the victim was out on the street. That would be a legitimate defence. However, if the offender were a swimming coach of the victim and went to the pool to do some laps at the same time he used to coach that person, and the victim was practising at that time, then the offender should have known.
I'm giving two scenarios. It would be up to the courts to determine if the offender breached the conditions of release. Again, the courts have the discretion to make sure that justice is done.