But, you see, we're two lawyers, and obviously we're not necessarily seeing or reading the decision the same way. So that might be problematic. Instead of having us two lawyers discuss amongst ourselves and other lawyers, maybe it would be interesting to have the view of the court on the thing.
But you're talking about studies. What's wrong with you guys that you cannot send to this committee the studies on charter compliance that you had done? I know you're going to tell me that they're a matter of client privilege and so on, but I think these would help the committee see that the department did its job and did do the overview. I'd be interested in knowing what exactly was studied and how they analyzed the decision from the court, and did so in parallel with the actual BillC-36.