I don't know if the analysts can answer this. I think the hard part about getting statistics on this is complicated by the fact that....
Howard, I think you accurately.... I used to be a law enforcement officer. I know that when I found somebody who was guilty of multiple things—although I never charged anybody with anything this serious in my time—I would find that the most serious charge was usually the one that was proceeded with. I think you alluded to the fact that you very rarely would see a prosecutor or the investigative team pursue the charging of somebody with all three if it was particularly heinous, although it wasn't prohibited. Do I understand that right? It's just that usually they proceed with the most egregious factor. Is that correct?