I just want to follow up on that last series of answers.
We have it from our analysts that had this bill been in effect for the last while, there were five cases that would have been impacted. I've actually seen that research and Russell Williams isn't on it so it may be five or it may be six.
I heard you say, Mr. Krongold, that one explanation for this is that while there may be other individuals involved in cases like this, by the time you get to court it makes very little sense to proceed with anything except the most serious charge. Given those circumstances and the very limited scope, as well intentioned as this bill is, do you see a distinct probability going forward that it will make no difference?